The Case, on Paper.
Ready to Forward.
Everything we'd walk you through in a conversation, written down — so you can take it to the people who aren't on the call. The executive deck for the budget conversation, the one-pager for the security reviewer. Both PDFs. No form, no email gate, no drip sequence.
Two Documents.
Two Different Rooms.
One is built for the meeting where budget gets decided. The other is built for the engineer or security reviewer who wants the architecture in ninety seconds. Take whichever fits the conversation you're having.
Executive Deck
The full argument in ten slides: why senior engineers become the bottleneck, what the boilerplate tax costs at enterprise volume, where existing tools stop short, and how the human review gate makes the whole thing defensible to an auditor.
- The problem — compliance drag on every IaC request
- The cost — 100 hrs/week, ~$390K/year recoverable
- The gap — Copilot and Spacelift side by side
- The solution — three stages, one permanent gate
- The architecture — single-tenant, in your account
- Design partnership terms and published pricing
One-Page Overview
A single page for the reviewer who won't read a deck. What the assistant does, why policy at generation time is different from scanning afterward, and why nothing about your infrastructure ever leaves your AWS account.
- Policy enforced at generation, not scanned after
- Terraform and CloudFormation at full parity
- Mandatory review gate — permanent, not configurable
- Policy evidence attached to every change
- Runs on ECS Fargate, Step Functions, and Bedrock in your VPC
- Current status — AWS today, Azure in development
The Boilerplate Tax
Is Measurable.
The figures the deck builds on. If your team is anywhere near these, the rest of the material will read as familiar.
Senior engineer hours spent on boilerplate IaC generation and review at a 100-request/week enterprise team.
Recoverable engineering capacity, modeled at fully-loaded enterprise engineer cost of roughly $150/hr.
The inflection point where the bottleneck stops being an annoyance and becomes a team-level crisis.
Based on customer discovery conversations. Fully-loaded cost modeled at ~$150/hr senior engineer total compensation.
Existing Tools Solve
Half the Problem.
The comparison slide, pulled out of the deck. It's the fastest way to explain the category to someone who has already evaluated two tools in it.
| Capability | Copilot / Amazon Q | Spacelift / env0 | OutcomeAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generates IaC templates | Yes | No | Yes |
| Policy enforced at generation | No | No | Yes |
| Ticket-to-template workflow | No | No | Yes |
| Permanent human review gate | No | Partial | Yes |
| Mid-market pricing | Yes | No | Yes |
The gap: a tool that enforces your security policy at the moment of generation and routes the result through a permanent human review gate — at pricing a mid-market platform team can actually approve.
Forward Them.
That's the Point.
These materials exist so you don't have to relay a conversation second-hand. Share them internally, quote them, drop them in a Slack thread — no permission needed.
Building the Internal Case
The deck covers the cost model and the competitive landscape in the order a budget owner asks about them. Slides 2 and 3 are usually the ones that get pasted into an email.
Clearing Security Review
Send the one-pager. The architecture section answers the question that kills most tooling purchases: nothing is multi-tenant, and no OutcomeAI-operated system holds credentials to your cloud.
Something Look Wrong?
The numbers come from discovery conversations, not a market report. If your reality contradicts them, that's worth a conversation — corrections from real platform teams shape the product.
See It Generate Against
Your Own Policy Set.
Thirty minutes, technical audience, no slides — not a canned demo. You describe how your team runs IaC today and where senior engineer hours actually go. If it isn't a fit, we'll say so.